Version 2 2016-04-08, 18:34Version 2 2016-04-08, 18:34
Version 1 2016-03-14, 19:43Version 1 2016-03-14, 19:43
journal contribution
posted on 2016-04-08, 18:34authored byJordan
E. Trachtenberg, Jesse K. Placone, Brandon T. Smith, Charlotte M. Piard, Marco Santoro, David W. Scott, John P. Fisher, Antonios G. Mikos
3D printing has emerged as an important
technique for fabricating
tissue engineered scaffolds. However, systematic evaluations of biomaterials
for 3D printing have not been widely investigated. We evaluated poly(propylene
fumarate) (PPF) as a model material for extrusion-based printing applications.
A full-factorial design evaluating the effects of four factors (PPF
concentration, printing pressure, printing speed, and programmed fiber
spacing) on viscosity, fiber diameter, and pore size was performed
layer-by-layer on 3D scaffolds. We developed a linear model of printing
solution viscosity, where concentration of PPF had the greatest effect
on viscosity, and the polymer exhibited shear thinning behavior. Additionally,
linear models of pore size and fiber diameter revealed that fiber
spacing and pressure had the greatest effect on pore size and fiber
diameter, respectively, but interplay among the factors also influenced
scaffold architecture. This study serves as a platform to determine
if novel biomaterials are suitable for extrusion-based 3D printing
applications.