posted on 2024-08-20, 15:33authored byYu-Jan Tseng, Zuway-R Hong, Huann-shyang Lin
Students’ scientific competencies can be improved
by structured
inquiry. Inquiry teaching laboratories that involve thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) techniques most often involve students examining experimental
results. In addition to the integration of structured inquiry into
the teaching laboratories of TLC, this quasi-experimental study involved
students in reflection on experimental procedures. We aimed to investigate
the impacts of this combination of structured inquiry and reflection
(i.e., reflective inquiry) on students’ chemical explanatory
levels. A total of n = 107 11th grade students participated
in this study. Students in the experimental group (EG; n = 58) engaged in a 10-week reflective inquiry while students in
the comparison group (CG; n = 49) engaged in confirmation
inquiry. Results showed that reflective inquiry enhanced students’
explanations at the experiential level. At the theoretical descriptive
level, students displayed misconceptions or misinterpretation of scientific
concepts. Furthermore, presenting the dynamic interactions within
the TLC system at the theoretical explanatory level was challenging
to students. The TLC assessment can provide chemistry teachers with
the opportunity to diagnose students’ misconceptions of the
TLC system at both the experiential level and the theoretical explanatory
level.