posted on 2023-03-21, 19:08authored bySeung-Ryoung Jung, James Kim, Lucia Vojtech, Joshua C. Vaughan, Daniel T. Chiu
Single-molecule
localization microscopy (SMLM) allows super-resolution
imaging, mapping, counting, and sizing of biological nanostructures
such as cell organelles and extracellular vesicles (EVs), but sizing
structures smaller than ∼100 nm can be inaccurate due to single-molecule
localization error caused by distortion of the point spread function
and limited photon number. Here we demonstrate a method to correct
localization error when sizing vesicles and other spherical nanoparticles
with SMLM and compare sizing results using two vesicle labeling schemes.
We use mean approximation theory to derive a simple equation using
full width at half-maximum (FWHM) for correcting particle sizes measured
by two-dimensional SMLM, validate the method by sizing streptavidin-coated
polystyrene nanobeads with the SMLM technique dSTORM
with and without error correction, using transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) for comparison, and then apply the method to sizing small seminal
EVs. Nanobead sizes measured by dSTORM became increasingly
less accurate (larger than TEM values) for beads smaller than 50 nm.
The error-correction method reduced the size difference versus TEM
from 15% without error correction to 7% with error correction for
40 nm beads, from 44% to 9% for 30 nm beads, and from 66% to 15% for
20 nm beads. Seminal EVs were labeled with a lipophilic membrane dye
(MemBright 700) and with an Alexa Fluor 488-anti-CD63 antibody conjugate,
and were sized separately using both dyes by dSTORM.
Error-corrected exosome diameters were smaller than uncorrected values:
72 nm vs 79 nm mean diameter with membrane dyes; 84 nm vs 97 nm with
the antibody-conjugated dyes. The mean error-corrected diameter was
12 nm smaller when using the membrane dye than when using the antibody-conjugated
dye likely due to the large size of the antibody. Thus, both the error-correction
method and the compact membrane labeling scheme reduce overestimation
of vesicle size by SMLM. This error-correction method has a low computational
cost as it does not require correction of individual blinking events,
and it is compatible with all SMLM techniques (e.g., PALM, STORM,
and DNA-PAINT).