posted on 2021-04-21, 04:29authored byCornelia W. Twining, N. Roxanna Razavi, J. Thomas Brenna, Sarah A. Dzielski, Sara T. Gonzalez, Peter Lawrence, Lisa B. Cleckner, Alexander S. Flecker
Aquatic-to-terrestrial subsidies
have the potential to provide
riparian consumers with benefits in terms of physiologically important
organic compounds like omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids
(n-3 LCPUFAs). However, they also have a “dark side”
in the form of exposure to toxicants such as mercury. Human land use
intensity may also determine whether subsidies provide benefits or
come at a cost for riparian predators. We sampled insects as well
as Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe) chicks in 2015–2016
within the southern Finger Lakes region to understand how food quality,
in terms of n-3 LCPUFAs and methylmercury (MeHg), of emergent freshwater
insects compared with that of terrestrial insects and how land use
affected the quality of prey, predator diet composition, and MeHg
exposure. Across the landscape, freshwater insects had a significantly
higher percentage of the n-3 LCPUFA eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) compared
to terrestrial insects and contained significantly more MeHg than
terrestrial insects did. In spite of differences in MeHg concentrations
between aquatic and terrestrial insects, chick MeHg concentrations
were not related to diet composition. Instead, chick MeHg concentrations
increased with several metrics of human land use intensity, including
percent agriculture. Our findings suggest that freshwater subsidies
provide predators with both risks and benefits, but that predator
MeHg exposure can vary with human land use intensity.