posted on 2016-02-22, 05:19authored byShuguang Ji, Christopher R. Cherry, Matthew J. Bechle, Ye Wu, Julian D. Marshall
E-bikes in China are the single largest adoption of alternative
fuel vehicles in history, with more than 100 million e-bikes purchased
in the past decade and vehicle ownership about 2× larger for
e-bikes as for conventional cars; e-car sales, too, are rapidly growing.
We compare emissions (CO2, PM2.5, NOX, HC) and environmental health impacts (primary PM2.5)
from the use of conventional vehicles (CVs) and electric vehicles
(EVs) in 34 major cities in China. CO2 emissions (g km–1) vary and are an order of magnitude greater for e-cars
(135–274) and CVs (150–180) than for e-bikes (14–27).
PM2.5 emission factors generally are lower for CVs (gasoline
or diesel) than comparable EVs. However, intake fraction is often
greater for CVs than for EVs because combustion emissions are generally
closer to population centers for CVs (tailpipe emissions) than for
EVs (power plant emissions). For most cities, the
net result is that primary PM2.5 environmental health impacts
per passenger-km are greater for e-cars than for gasoline cars (3.6×
on average), lower than for diesel cars (2.5× on average), and
equal to diesel buses. In contrast, e-bikes yield lower environmental
health impacts per passenger-km than the three CVs investigated: gasoline
cars (2×), diesel cars (10×), and diesel buses (5×).
Our findings highlight the importance of considering exposures, and
especially the proximity of emissions to people, when evaluating environmental
health impacts for EVs.