posted on 2022-12-29, 19:09authored byJack Dawson, Samual Coaster, Rui Han, Johannes Gausden, Hongzhong Liu, Glen McHale, Jinju Chen
Droplets impacting superhydrophobic surfaces have been
extensively
studied due to their compelling scientific insights and important
industrial applications. In these cases, the commonly reported impact
regime was that of complete rebound. This impact regime strongly depends
on the nature of the superhydrophobic surface. Here, we report the
dynamics of droplets impacting three hydrophobic slippery surfaces,
which have fundamental differences in normal liquid adhesion and lateral
static and kinetic liquid friction. For an air cushion-like (super)hydrophobic
solid surface (Aerogel) with low adhesion and low static and low kinetic
friction, complete rebound can start at a very low Weber (We) number (∼1). For slippery liquid-infused porous
(SLIP) surfaces with high adhesion and low static and low kinetic
friction, complete rebound only occurs at a much higher We number (>5). For a slippery omniphobic covalently attached liquid-like
(SOCAL) solid surface, with high adhesion and low static friction
similar to SLIPS but higher kinetic friction, complete rebound was
not observed, even for a We as high as 200. Furthermore,
the droplet ejection volume after impacting the Aerogel surface is
100% across the whole range of We numbers tested
compared to other surfaces. In contrast, droplet ejection for SLIPs
was only observed consistently when the We was above
5–10. For SOCAL, 100% (or near 100%) ejection volume was not
observed even at the highest We number tested here
(∼200). This suggests that droplets impacting our (super)hydrophobic
Aerogel and SLIPS lose less kinetic energy. These insights into the
differences between normal adhesion and lateral friction properties
can be used to inform the selection of surface properties to achieve
the most desirable droplet impact characteristics to fulfill a wide
range of applications, such as deicing, inkjet printing, and microelectronics.