jp5b01444_si_001.pdf (3.64 MB)
Download fileDesorption Kinetics and Activation Energy for Cobalt Octaethylporphyrin from Graphite at the Phenyloctane Solution–Graphite Interface: An STM Study
journal contribution
posted on 2015-04-30, 00:00 authored by Ashish Bhattarai, Ursula Mazur, K. W. HippsTemperature-dependent
desorption rates and desorption energies
are determined from a monolayer assembly at the solution–solid
(SS) interface. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) was used to measure
molecular-scale temperature-dependent desorption of cobalt(II) octaethylporphyrin
(CoOEP) at the phenyloctane solution–highly ordered pyrolytic
graphite (HOPG) interface. At lower temperatures, monolayer formation
of metal(II) octaethylporphyrin (MOEP) on HOPG from solution was found
to be completely controlled by kinetics, and the adlayer formed was
stable up to 70 °C. Significant desorption of CoOEP from the
HOPG surface was observed above 80 °C on a time scale of hours.
CoOEP desorbs from HOPG into phenyloctane at a rate of 0.0055 ±
0.0007 min–1 at 90 °C, 0.013 ± 0.001 min–1 at 100 °C, and 0.033 ± 0.003 min–1 at 110 °C. From these temperature- and time-dependent measurements,
assuming an Arrhenius rate law, the activation energy of molecular
desorption at the SS interface was determined using studies solely
based on STM. The desorption energy of CoOEP from HOPG into phenyloctane
is determined to be 1.05 × 102 ± 0.03 ×
102 kJ/mol. NiOEP desorption occurs at a slower rate and
is homogeneous across HOPG terraces, unlike the inhomogeneous desorption
observed on Au(111). A previous study performed on Au(111) reported
that the rate of desorption of CoOEP is 0.004 min–1 at 135 °C. The calculated desorption rate on HOPG in this work
is 0.22 min–1, making the rate of desorption of
CoOEP from HOPG 2 orders of magnitude greater than from Au(111). On
the other hand, for solution concentrations of the order of 100 μM,
a dense monolayer is formed within seconds. For this fast adsorption
process, where a full monolayer coverage occurs, the surface coverage
of MOEP on both surfaces was determined by the relative concentration
of each species in the phenyloctane solution. The rates of adsorption
(for concentrations near 100 μM) are found to be within 20%
of each other. The surface structures of both the NiOEP and CoOEP
on HOPG and Au(111) are very similar and can be described by A = 1.30 ± 0.04 nm, B = 1.40 ±
0.04 nm, and α = 57° ± 2° with an area of 1.50
± 0.08 nm2/molecule.
History
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
Keywords
Arrhenius rate lawActivation Energytime scalesurface coverageMOEPsolution concentrationsHOPG terracesCobalt Octaethylporphyrindesorption rateHOPG surfacepyrolytic graphite100 μ Madsorption processdesorption energiesphenyloctane solutionmonolayer coveragesurface structuresmonolayer formationHOPG 2 ordersSS interfacedesorption energyminScanning tunneling microscopymonolayer assemblyDesorption KineticsSignificant desorptionSTMCoOEP desorbsactivation energy