posted on 2013-11-27, 00:00authored byPanagiotis Angelikopoulos, Costas Papadimitriou, Petros Koumoutsakos
For over five decades, molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations have
helped to elucidate critical mechanisms in a broad range of physiological
systems and technological innovations. MD simulations are synergetic
with experiments, relying on measurements to calibrate their parameters
and probing “what if scenarios” for systems that are
difficult to investigate experimentally. However, in certain systems,
such as nanofluidics, the results of experiments and MD simulations
differ by several orders of magnitude. This discrepancy may be attributed
to the spatiotemporal scales and structural information accessible
by experiments and simulations. Furthermore, MD simulations rely on
parameters that are often calibrated semiempirically, while the effects
of their computational implementation on their predictive capabilities
have only been sporadically probed. In this work, we show that experimental
and MD investigations can be consolidated through a rigorous uncertainty
quantification framework. We employ a Bayesian probabilistic framework
for large scale MD simulations of graphitic nanostructures in aqueous
environments. We assess the uncertainties in the MD predictions for
quantities of interest regarding wetting behavior and hydrophobicity.
We focus on three representative systems: water wetting of graphene,
the aggregation of fullerenes in aqueous solution, and the water transport
across carbon nanotubes. We demonstrate that the dominant mode of
calibrating MD potentials in nanoscale fluid mechanics, through single
values of water contact angle on graphene, leads to large uncertainties
and fallible quantitative predictions. We demonstrate that the use
of additional experimental data reduces uncertainty, improves the
predictive accuracy of MD models, and consolidates the results of
experiments and simulations.