jp6b07758_si_001.pdf (107.53 kB)
Download file

Competing Forces in Chiral Surface Chemistry: Enantiospecificity versus Enantiomer Aggregation

Download (107.53 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 03.11.2016, 00:00 by Yongju Yun, Andrew J. Gellman
The enantiospecific adsorption of enantiomer mixtures on surfaces is dictated by two competing forces: the enantiospecificity of adsorption energetics and the propensity of enantiomers to aggregate into homochiral (conglomerate) or heterochiral (racemate) clusters. These phenomena have been studied by measuring the surface enantiomeric excess, ees, of chiral amino acid mixtures adsorbed on Cu single-crystal surfaces and in equilibrium with gas-phase mixtures of varying enantiomeric excess, eeg. Alanine adsorption on Cu­{3,1,17}R&S surfaces is nonenantiospecific, ees = eeg, because alanine enantiomers do not interact with either the surface or with one another enantiospecifically. Aspartic acid adsorbs enantiospecifically on the Cu­{3,1,17}R&S surfaces; eeseeg, even during exposure to a racemic mixture in the gas phase, eeg = 0. Exposure of the achiral Cu{111} surface to nonracemic aspartic acid, eeg ≠ 0, results in local amplification of enantiomeric excess on the surface, |ees| > |eeg|, as a result of homochiral aggregation. Finally, despite the fact that the Cu{653}R&S surfaces are chiral, the adsorption of aspartic acid mixtures yields |ees| > |eeg|, indicating that homochiral aggregation dominates enantiospecific adsorbate–surface interactions. All of these types of behavior are captured by a Langmuir-like adsorption isotherm that includes competition between enantiospecific adsorption and both homochiral (conglomerate) and heterochiral (racemate) aggregation of chiral adsorbates.

History