posted on 2013-01-15, 00:00authored byWiktoria Walczyk, Holger Schönherr
To date, TM AFM (tapping mode or intermittent contact
mode atomic
force microscopy) is the most frequently applied direct imaging technique
to visualize surface nanobubbles at the solid–aqueous interface.
On one hand, AFM is the only profilometric technique that provides
estimates of the bubbles’ nanoscopic dimensions. On the other
hand, the nanoscopic contact angles of surface nanobubbles estimated
from their apparent dimensions that are deduced from AFM “height”
images of nanobubbles differ markedly from the macrocopic water contact
angles on the identical substrates. Here we show in detail how the
apparent bubble height and width of surface nanobubbles on highly
oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) depend on the free amplitude of
the cantilever oscillations and the amplitude setpoint ratio. (The
role of these two AFM imaging parameters and their interdependence
has not been studied so far for nanobubbles in a systematic way.)
In all experiments, even with optimal scanning parameters, nanobubbles
at the HOPG–water interface appeared to be smaller in the AFM
images than their true size, which was estimated using a method presented
herein. It was also observed that the severity of the underestimate
increased with increasing bubble height and radius of curvature. The
nanoscopic contact angle of >130° for nanobubbles on HOPG
extrapolated
to zero interaction force was only slightly overestimated and hence
significantly higher than the macroscopic contact angle of water on
HOPG (63 ± 2°). Thus, the widely reported contact angle
discrepancy cannot be solely attributed to inappropriate AFM imaging
conditions.