posted on 2016-06-28, 00:00authored byDavid J. Lee, Arjun Fontaine, Xianzhong Meng, Daewon Park
Although the gold
standard for the surgical treatment of peripheral
nerve injury, the autograft is associated with many drawbacks, including
a second surgical procedure, donor site morbidity, mismatch of donor
nerve size, and limited donor nerve length. As an alternative to the
autograft, nerve guidance conduits may be used to promote neuronal
growth and guide axonal extension after nerve injury. Using a blend
of RGD-conjugated polyurea and polycaprolactone, a nerve guidance
conduit was designed consisting of intraluminal microchannels with
aligned nanofibers. A 10 mm sciatic nerve transection rat model was
used to evaluate the efficacy of the conduit up to 8 weeks after nerve
transection and conduit implantation. Restoration of electrophysiological
activity from the nerve guidance conduit was significantly improved
compared to the autograft. Functional and histological assessments
indicated that the nerve guidance conduit is comparable to autograft
in functional recovery and target muscle reinnervation, respectively.