posted on 2001-02-10, 00:00authored byDavid W. Schwenke
It is customary when computing ro−vibrational transitions in molecules to invoke the Born−Oppenheimer
separation between nuclear and electronic motion. However, it is known from accurate calculations on H2+
and H2 that the first-order (diagonal adiabatic) and second-order (nonadiabatic) corrections are not negligible
and are both important. In the present work, we have made an ab initio implementation of the Bunker and
Moss formalism for the nonadiabatic correction and applied it to H2 and H2O. From comparison to accurate
calculations for H2, we find that we can obtain good results for the nonadiabatic correction using CI singles
to treat the electronically excited states if we scale the results, but we must go beyond the SCF approximation
to obtain an accurate diagonal adiabatic correction. For H2O, we find that the first-order correction is more
important than the second-order correction for bending energy levels, but the second-order correction is more
important than the first-order correction for stretching energy levels. The correction to rotational levels is
also significant. Thus, first- and second-order corrections are vital for accurate ab initio predictions of transition
frequencies.