ab8b01390_si_001.pdf (106.9 kB)
Download fileBeyond Linear Elastic Modulus: Viscoelastic Models for Brain and Brain Mimetic Hydrogels
journal contribution
posted on 23.04.2019, 00:00 authored by Mark A. Calhoun, Sarah A. Bentil, Eileen Elliott, Jose J. Otero, Jessica O. Winter, Rebecca B. DupaixWith their high degree of specificity
and investigator control,
in vitro disease models provide a natural complement to in vivo models.
Especially in organs such as the brain, where anatomical limitations
make in vivo experiments challenging, in vitro models have been increasingly
used to mimic disease pathology. However, brain mimetic models may
not fully replicate the mechanical environment in vivo, which has
been shown to influence a variety of cell behaviors. Specifically,
many disease models consider only the linear elastic modulus of brain,
which describes the stiffness of a material with the assumption that
mechanical behavior is independent of loading rate. Here, we characterized
porcine brain tissue using a modified stress relaxation test, and
across a panel of viscoelastic models, showed that stiffness depends
on loading rate. As such, the linear elastic modulus does not accurately
reflect the viscoelastic properties of native brain. Among viscoelastic
models, the Maxwell model was selected for further analysis because
of its simplicity and excellent curve fit (R2 = 0.99 ± 0.0006). Thus, mechanical response of native
brain and hydrogel mimetic models was analyzed using the Maxwell model
and the linear elastic model to evaluate the effects of strain rate,
time post mortem, region, tissue type (i.e., bulk brain vs white matter),
and in brain mimetic models, hydrogel composition, on observed mechanical
properties. In comparing the Maxwell and linear elastic models, linear
elastic modulus is consistently lower than the Maxwell elastic modulus
across all brain regions. Additionally, the Maxwell model is sensitive
to changes in viscosity and small changes in elasticity, demonstrating
improved fidelity. These findings demonstrate the insufficiency of
linear elastic modulus as a primary mechanical characterization for
brain mimetic materials and provide quantitative information toward
the future design of materials that more closely mimic mechanical
features of brain.