posted on 2014-09-09, 00:00authored byMarkéta Paloncýová, Gabin Fabre, Russell H. DeVane, Patrick Trouillas, Karel Berka, Michal Otyepka
Studies of drug–membrane interactions
witness an ever-growing
interest, as penetration, accumulation, and positioning of drugs play
a crucial role in drug delivery and metabolism in human body. Molecular
dynamics simulations complement nicely experimental measurements and
provide us with new insight into drug-membrane interactions; however,
the quality of the theoretical data dramatically depends on the quality
of the force field used. We calculated the free energy profiles of
11 molecules through a model dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC)
membrane bilayer using five force fields, namely Berger, Slipids,
CHARMM36, GAFFlipids, and GROMOS 43A1-S3. For the sake of comparison,
we also employed the semicontinuous tool COSMOmic. High correlation
was observed between theoretical and experimental partition coefficients
(log K). Partition coefficients calculated by all-atomic
force fields (Slipids, CHARMM36, and GAFFlipids) and COSMOmic differed
by less than 0.75 log units from the experiment and Slipids emerged
as the best performing force field. This work provides the following
recommendations (i) for a global, systematic and high throughput thermodynamic
evaluations (e.g., log K) of drugs COSMOmic is a
tool of choice due to low computational costs; (ii) for studies of
the hydrophilic molecules CHARMM36 should be considered; and (iii)
for studies of more complex systems, taking into account all pros
and cons, Slipids is the force field of choice.