Benchmark Studies on the
Building Blocks of DNA. 1.
Superiority of Coupled Cluster Methods in Describing the Excited States
of Nucleobases in the Franck–Condon Region
posted on 2012-06-28, 00:00authored byPéter G. Szalay, Thomas Watson, Ajith Perera, Victor
F. Lotrich, Rodney J. Bartlett
Equation of motion excitation energy coupled-cluster
(EOMEE-CC)
methods including perturbative triple excitations have been used to
set benchmark results for the excitation energy and oscillator strength
of the building units of DNA, i.e., cytosine, guanine, adenine and
thymine. In all cases the lowest twelve transitions have been considered
including valence and Rydberg ones. Triple-ζ basis sets with
diffuse functions have been used and the results are compared to CC2,
CASPT2, TDDFT, and DFT/MRCI results from the literature. The results
clearly show that it is only the EOMEE-CCSD(T) that is capable of
providing accuracy of about 0.1 eV. EOMEE-CCSD systematically overshoots
the energy of all types of transitions by 0.1–0.3 eV, whereas
CC2 is surprisingly accurate for ππ* transitions but fails
(often badly) for nπ* and Rydberg transitions. DFT and CASPT2
seem to give reliable results for the lowest transition, but the error
increases fast with the excitation level. The differences in the excitation
energies often change the energy ordering of the states, which should
even influence the conclusions of excited state dynamics obtained
with these approximate methods. The results call for further benchmark
calculations on larger building blocks of DNA (nucleosides, basis
pairs) at the CCSD(T) level.