American Chemical Society
Browse

B–H Bond Activation in a Rh(III) Hydrido Borohydride Complex [Rh(H)(K<sup>2</sup>‑BH<sub>4</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] Gives a Rh(I) σ‑Dihydrogen Complex [Rh(η<sup>2</sup>‑H<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)]: An Experimental and Theoretical Study

Download (5.63 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-09, 09:08 authored by Selvakumar Selvarasu, Gaurav Joshi, Dineshchakravarthy Senthurpandi, Munirathinam Nethaji, Eluvathingal D. Jemmis, Balaji R. Jagirdar
Rh­(III) pincer hydrido chloride and borohydride complexes [Rh­(H)­Cl<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>1</b>) [<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP) = 2,6-bis­((di-tert-butylphosphaneyl)­amino)­benzen-1-ide] and [Rh­(H)­(K<sup>2</sup>-BH<sub>4</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>2</b>) have been synthesized and characterized. Heating the [Rh­(H)­(K<sup>2</sup>-BH<sub>4</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] complex (<b>2</b>) at 336 K in tetrahydrofuran (THF) afforded the Rh­(I) σ-H<sub>2</sub> complex, [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>3</b>), and H<sub>3</sub>B·THF via the B–H bond activation of the borohydride. The [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-HD)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>3-HD</b>) isotopomer was also prepared by heating the [Rh­(H)­(K<sup>2</sup>-BD<sub>4</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] complex (<b>2-BD</b><sub><b>4</b></sub>) at 336 K in THF. The formation of [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>3</b>) was established using <sup>1</sup><i>J</i><sub>H,D</sub> coupling constant and variable temperature spin–lattice relaxation time measurements and supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. At 273 K, the [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] complex (<b>3</b>) reverted back to the [Rh­(H)­(K<sup>2</sup>-BH<sub>4</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] complex (<b>2</b>) upon reaction with H<sub>3</sub>B·THF. The [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] complex (<b>3</b>) was also obtained independently by two alternative routes. The reaction of [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>3</b>) with N<sub>2</sub> at 273 K afforded the [Rh­(N<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] complex (<b>4</b>); this reaction was found to be reversible. The reaction of [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>3</b>) with CH<sub>3</sub>CN, CO, and O<sub>2</sub> occurred instantaneously and yielded the corresponding products [Rh­(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>5</b>), [Rh­(CO)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>6</b>), and [Rh­(η<sup>2</sup>-O<sub>2</sub>)<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>(PNCNP)] (<b>7</b>), respectively. These observations together with computational studies showed that the binding strengths of CH<sub>3</sub>CN, CO, and O<sub>2</sub> with the Rh center are significantly greater than those of H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>.

History