The
analysis of ecosystem services (ES) is becoming a key-factor
to implement policies on sustainable technologies. Accordingly, life
cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods are more and more oriented
toward the development of harmonized characterization models to address
impacts on ES. However, such efforts are relatively recent and have
not reached full consensus yet. We investigate here on the transdisciplinary
pillars related to the modeling of LCIA on ES by conducting a critical
review and comparison of the state-of-the-art in both LCIA and ES
domains. We observe that current LCIA practices to assess impacts
on “ES provision” suffer from incompleteness in modeling
the cause-effect chains; the multifunctionality of ecosystems is omitted;
and the “flow” nature of ES is not considered. Furthermore,
ES modeling in LCIA is limited by its static calculation framework,
and the valuation of ES also experiences some limitations. The conceptualization
of land use (changes) as the main impact driver on ES, and the corresponding
approaches to retrieve characterization factors, eventually embody
several methodological shortcomings, such as the lack of time-dependency
and interrelationships between elements in the cause-effect chains.
We conclude that future LCIA modeling of ES could benefit from the
harmonization with existing integrated multiscale dynamic integrated
approaches.