posted on 2018-07-13, 00:00authored byMaliheh Shaban Tameh, Albert K. Dearden, Chen Huang
Density
functional theory (DFT) is widely used for investigating heterogeneous
catalysis; however, the predictive power of DFT is determined by the
approximation used in the exchange–correlation (XC) functionals.
In this work, we systematically investigate how the kinetics of methanol
synthesis predicted by DFT depends on the choice of XC functionals.
Microkinetic modeling is performed based on the Gibbs energies calculated
with XC functionals that represent three levels of accuracy: Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof
(PBE) functional, Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof (HSE) hybrid
functional, and the random phase approximation (RPA) functional. We
show that the predicted kinetics strongly depends on the choice of
XC functionals. Methanol’s turnover frequencies predicted by
PBE and HSE are about 30 times faster than the predictions from RPA.
PBE predicts that the overall barrier of CO hydrogenation is 0.56
eV lower than that of CO2 hydrogenation, therefore suggesting
CO as the carbon source for methanol synthesis on copper. This contradicts
previous isotope-labeling experiments that supported CO2 as the carbon source in industrial methanol synthesis; therefore,
PBE suggests that metallic copper cannot be the active site for CO2 hydrogenation. On the other hand, the overall barrier of
CO hydrogenation, predicted by HSE and RPA, is lower than the overall
barrier of CO2 hydrogenation by 0.22 and 0.14 eV, respectively.
This suggests that CO2 hydrogenation is also competitive
for methanol production, and we cannot completely rule out the possibility
that metallic copper is the active site for catalyzing CO2 hydrogenation. In addition, the prediction of the dominating adsorbates
also strongly depends on the choice of XC functionals. Our results
show that different XC functionals can predict different kinetics
for methanol synthesis, which calls attention to the accuracy of DFT
for modeling methanol synthesis.