Singlet−Triplet Splittings and 1,2-Hydrogen Shift Barriers for Methylphenylborenide, Methylphenylcarbene, and Methylphenylnitrenium in the Gas Phase and Solution. What a Difference a Charge Makes
journal contributionposted on 17.12.1997 by Christopher J. Cramer, Donald G. Truhlar, Daniel E. Falvey
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
In the isoelectronic series methylphenylborenide, methylphenylcarbene, and methylphenylnitrenium, fundamental differences are predicted for singlet state geometries, singlet−triplet state splittings, barriers to singlet 1,2-hydrogen migration, and sensitivity of 1,2-hydrogen migration to solvent effects in n-heptane and acetonitrile. We conclude that isoelectronic analogies are dangerous for systems having different formal charges, and that the interaction of the divalent center with a conjugating substituent is very sensitive to the electron donating or withdrawing nature (and power) of the hypovalent atom. Solvent effects on the singlet−triplet splitting result from static polarity differences whereas the solvent effects on 1,2-hydrogen migration result primarily from polarizability differences. For the experimentally characterized carbene case, extensive comparison of calculated and measured results is provided.