Influence of Rotator Design on the Speed of Self-Assembled Four-Component Nanorotors: Coordinative Versus Dispersive Interactions
journal contributionposted on 17.05.2017 by Pronay Kumar Biswas, Suchismita Saha, Yerramsetti Nanaji, Anup Rana, Michael Schmittel
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
Four-component nanorotors are prepared by the self-assembly of stator [Cu4(4)]4+ with its four copper(I)-loaded phenanthroline stations and various rotators carrying one, two, or three pyridine terminals. The fourth component, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, serves as a connecting axle between rotator and stator. Capitalizing on the heteroleptic pyridyl and phenanthroline metal complexes concept, the rotator’s pyridine terminals are connected to the copper(I)-loaded phenanthroline stations (Npy → [Cu(phen)]+) in the STOP state and disconnected in the transition state of rotation. As the barrier of the thermally activated rotation, measured by variable-temperature 1H NMR, is mainly governed by attractive forces between stator stations and rotator terminals, it increases along the series Ea (monopyridine rotator) < Ea (dipyridine rotator) < Ea (tripyridine rotator). However, there are even distinct differences in rate between rotors with equal number of rotator terminals. The change from the 5,10-dipyridyl (cis) to 5,15-dipyridyl (trans) zinc porphyrin rotator enhances the rotational frequency by almost 1000-fold. Density functional theory computational results suggest that not only coordinative Npy → [Cu(phen)]+ interactions but also dispersive attraction influence the barrier of rotation.