posted on 2004-11-03, 00:00authored byTatiana V. Timofeeva, Tiffany Kinnibrugh, Oleg Ya. Borbulevych, Boris B. Averkiev, Vladimir N. Nesterov, Andreanne Sloan, Mikhail Yu. Antipin
Synthesis and crystallization of a polar organic compound (2E)-2-cyano-3-[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]prop-2-enethioamide (CDPE) gave two new crystalline polymorphs (1 and 2) and an acetonitrile solvate (pseudopolymorph, 3) of this compound. The third crystalline polymorph of CDPE (4) was described in the literature earlier. It
was found that in crystalline polymorphs 1, 2, and 4 molecules adopt three different conformations. Experimental
observations show that polymorph 1 is a predominant form of the CDPE compound, while all other crystalline forms
we were unable to reproduce under different conditions. Quantum ab initio calculations of relative conformational
energies of molecules found in these polymorphs revealed that the conformer in polymorph 1 has significantly lower
energy than conformers in polymorphs 2 and 4. This fact explains the predominant formation of polymorph 1 under
different experimental conditions. The polarity of CDPE molecules and distinctions in their molecular and crystal
structures make CDPE polymorphs 1, 2, and 4 a perfect model for testing of the methodology of crystal structure
prediction with the Polymorph Predictor module from the Cerius2 program package. It was shown that if the starting
molecular model corresponds to X-ray data and considered to be rigid it is possible to predict all three polymorphs.
In contrast, usage of a flexible molecular model does not give positive results. Reasons for such differences are
discussed.