posted on 2024-01-19, 04:43authored bySonam Suthar, Kartik Chandra Mondal
Transition metal-based organometallic compounds have
been explained
by the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson (DCD) model, established
in 1953, which provides a conceptual framework elucidating the interaction
between transition metals and ligands. This interaction involves σ-donation
from the ligand to the symmetric vacant d-orbital of the transition
metal (TM⃖L), coupled with π-backdonation from a distinctly
occupied d-orbital of the transition metal to the suitable empty orbital
(mostly antibonding type) on the ligand (TM → L), which leads
to the variations in bond lengths in the bonded ligand (typically
bond elongation) and vibrational frequencies within ligand bonds (such
as C=O, N=N, and C=C of olefins), serving as an indicator of the ligand’s
π-accepting strength. One such effective and highly reactive
ligand is benzyne/aryne, which is generated in situ and has been stabilized by coordinating to a transition metal. The
transition metal–aryne complexes are primarily formed with
low-valent early transition metals and late (d10) transition
metals. The findings, on employing the EDA-NOCV calculations of different
classical textbook examples of experimentally synthesized mononuclear
TM–aryne complexes, specifically TM–benzyne complexes,
reveal intriguing deviations from the original DCD model and suggest
that the bonding interaction of these well-known organometallic complexes
occurs between TM and aryne fragments in their ‘electronically
charged doublet states’ (as TM+ and aryne–). Notably, when the TM resides within groups IV–IX of the
periodic table, the interaction exhibits one dative σ-bond,
one electron-sharing π-bond, and one (a few have two) additional
dative σ/π bond (D + E). Even though late TM (d10, Ni/Pd/Pt) exhibits the potential to form both dative bonds (D)
(in accordance with the DCD model) and D + E interaction between electronically
charged fragments, it still slightly favors the later bonding scenario.
The major contribution in the bond formation of TM–aryne complexes
is from electrostatic interaction energy (ΔEelstat) and the major contribution toward the orbital
interaction (ΔEorb) is dominated
by the electron sharing π-bond formation.