posted on 2023-04-24, 17:05authored byAzad Eshghi, Xiaofeng Xie, Darryl Hardie, Michael X. Chen, Fabiana Izaguirre, Rachael Newman, Ying Zhu, Ryan T. Kelly, David R. Goodlett
We compared three cell isolation and two proteomic sample
preparation
methods for single-cell and near-single-cell analysis. Whole blood
was used to quantify hemoglobin (Hb) and glycated-Hb (gly-Hb) in erythrocytes
using targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope-labeled standard
peptides. Each method differed in cell isolation and sample preparation
as follows: 1) FACS and automated preparation in one-pot for trace
samples (autoPOTS); 2) limited dilution via microscopy and a novel
rapid one-pot sample preparation method that circumvented the need
for the solid-phase extraction, low-volume liquid handling instrumentation
and humidified incubation chamber; and 3) CellenONE-based cell isolation
and the same one-pot sample preparation method used for limited dilution.
Only the CellenONE device routinely isolated single-cells from which
Hb was measured to be 540–660 amol per red blood cell (RBC),
which was comparable to the calculated SI reference range for mean
corpuscular hemoglobin (390–540 amol/RBC). FACSAria sorter
and limited dilution could routinely isolate single-digit cell numbers,
to reliably quantify CMV-Hb heterogeneity. Finally, we observed that
repeated measures, using 5–25 RBCs obtained from N = 10 blood donors, could be used as an alternative and more efficient
strategy than single RBC analysis to measure protein heterogeneity,
which revealed multimodal distribution, unique for each individual.