posted on 2004-03-08, 00:00authored byFredy Speiser, Pierre Braunstein, Lucien Saussine, Richard Welter
The phosphinitooxazoline 4,4-dimethyl-2-[1-oxy(diphenylphosphine)-1-methylethyl]-4,5-dihydrooxazole (9), the corresponding phosphinitopyridine ligands 2-ethyl-[1‘-methyl-1‘-oxy(diphenylphosphino)]pyridine (11) and 2-ethyl-6-methyl-[1‘-methyl-1‘-oxy(diphenylphosphino)]pyridine (12), which have a one-carbon spacer between the phosphinite
oxygen and the heterocycle, and the homologous ligand 2-propyl-[2‘-methyl-2‘-oxy(diphenylphosphino)]pyridine (13),
with a two-carbon spacer, were prepared in good yields. The corresponding mononuclear [NiCl2(P,N)] complexes
14 (P,N = 9), 15 (P,N = 11), and 16 (P,N = 12) and the dinuclear [NiCl(μ-Cl)(P,N)]217 (P,N = 13) Ni(II) complex
were evaluated in the catalytic oligomerization of ethylene. These four complexes were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction in the solid state and in solution with the help of the Evans method, which indicated
differences between the coordination spheres in the solution and the solid state. In the presence of methylalumoxane
(MAO) or AlEt3, only the decomposition of the Ni complexes was observed. However, complexes 14−17 provided
activities up to 50 000 mol C2H4/(mol Ni)·h (16 and 17) in the presence of only 6 equiv of AlEtCl2. The observed
selectivities for ethylene dimers were higher than 91% (for 14 or 15 in the presence of only 1.3 equiv of AlEtCl2).
The activities for 14−17 were superior to that of [NiCl2(PCy3)2], a typical dimerization catalyst taken as a reference.
The selectivities of the complexes 14−17 for ethylene dimers and α-olefins were the same order of magnitude.
From the study of the phosphinite 9/AlEtCl2 system, we concluded that in our case ligand transfer from the nickel
atom to the aluminum cocatalyst is unlikely to represent an activation mechanism.