posted on 2020-09-01, 15:11authored byGregory
R. Lorzing, Krista P. Balto, Alexandra M. Antonio, Benjamin A. Trump, Craig M. Brown, Eric D. Bloch
Ru-HKUST-1 (Ru3(btc)2X1.5; btc3– =
1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate; X– = chloride, acetate,
trimesate, hydroxide) has received considerable
attention as a result of its structure type, tunability, and the redox-active
nature of its constituent metal paddlewheel building units. When compared
to other members of the HKUST-1 family, its surface area is typically
reported as ∼25% lower than expected. In contrast to this,
a related ruthenium-based porous coordination cage, Ru24(tBu-bdc)24Cl12, displays the expected
surface area when compared to Cr2+ and Mo2+ analogs.
Here, we examine the factors that result in this decreased surface
area for the metal–organic framework (MOF). We show that with
appropriate solvent exchange and activation conditions, Ru-HKUST-1
can display a BET surface area as high as 1439 m2/g. We
utilize a combination of spectroscopic and diffraction techniques
to accurately determine the structure of the MOF, which is most accurately
described here as Ru3(btc)2(OAc)1.07Cl0.43, as prepared under our conditions. Furthermore,
simply treating the sample as air-sensitive upon isolation greatly
improved the adsorption selectivities toward unsaturated molecules.