American Chemical Society
ic503070j_si_002.cif (21.08 kB)

Ancillary Ligand Control of Electronic Structure in o-Benzoquinonediimine-Ruthenium Complex Redox Series: Structures, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR), and Ultraviolet−Visible−Near-Infrared (UV-vis-NIR) Spectroelectrochemistry

Download (21.08 kB)
posted on 2015-04-06, 00:00 authored by Ankita Das, Prabir Ghosh, Sebastian Plebst, Brigitte Schwederski, Shaikh M. Mobin, Wolfgang Kaim, Goutam Kumar Lahiri
The compounds Ru­(acac)2(Q) (1), [Ru­(bpy)2(Q)]­(ClO4)2 ([2]­(ClO4)2), and [Ru­(pap)2(Q)]­PF6 ([3]­PF6), containing Q = N,N′-diphenyl-o-benzoquinonediimine and donating 2,4-pentanedionate ligands (acac), π-accepting 2,2/-bipyridine (bpy), or strongly π-accepting 2-phenylazopyridine (pap) were prepared and structurally identified. The electronic structures of the complexes and several accessible oxidized and reduced forms were studied experimentally (electrochemistry, magnetic resonance, ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared (UV-vis-NIR) spectroelectrochemistry) and computationally (DFT/TD-DFT) to reveal significantly variable electron transfer behavior and charge distribution. While the redox system 1+1 prefers trivalent ruthenium with corresponding oxidation states Q0–Q2– of the noninnocent ligand, the series 22+20 and 32+3 retain RuII. The bpy and pap co-ligands are not only spectators but can also be reduced prior to a second reduction of Q. The present study with new experimental and computational evidence on the influence of co-ligands on the metal is complementary to a report on the substituent effects in o-quinonediimine ligands [Kalinina et al., Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 10110] and to the discussion of the most appropriate oxidation state formulation RuII(Q0) or RuIII(Q• –).