Trans- and Cis-Water Reactivities in d6 Octahedral Ruthenium(II) Pentaaqua Complexes: Experimental and Density Functional Theory Studies1,2
1997-12-17T00:00:00Z (GMT) by
The hexaaqua complex of ruthenium(II) represents an ideal starting material for the synthesis of isostructural compounds with a [Ru(H2O-ax)(H2O-eq)4L]2+ general formula. We have studied a series of complexes, where L = H2O, MeCN, Me2SO, H2CCH2, CO, and F2CCH2. We have evaluated the effect of L on the cyclic voltammetric response, on the rate and mechanism of exchange reaction of the water molecules, and on the structures calculated with the density functional theory (DFT). As expected, the formal redox potential, E°‘(+2/+3), increases with the π-accepting capabilities of the ligands. For L = N2, the oxidation to Ru(III) is followed by a fast substitution of dinitrogen by a solvent molecule, revealing the poor stability of the Ru(III)−N2 bond. The water exchange reactions have been followed by 17O NMR spectroscopy. The variable-pressure and variable-temperature kinetic studies made on selected examples are all in accordance with a dissociative activation mode for exchange. The positive activation volumes obtained for the axial and equatorial water exchange reactions on [Ru(H2O)5(H2CCH2)]2+ (ΔVax⧧ and ΔVeq⧧ = +6.5 ± 0.5 and +6.1 ± 0.2 cm3 mol-1) are the strongest evidence of this conclusion. The increasing cis-effect series was established according to the lability of the equatorial water molecules and is as follows: F2CCH2 ≅ CO < Me2SO < N2 < H2CCH2 < MeCN < H2O. The increase of the lability is accompanied by a decrease of the E°‘ values, but no change was found in the calculated Ru−H2Oeq bond lengths. The increasing trans-effect series, established from the lability of the axial water molecule, is the following: N2 ≪ MeCN < H2O < CO < Me2SO < H2CCH2 < F2CCH2. A variation of the Ru−H2Oax bond lengths is observed in the calculated structures. However, the best correlation is found between the lability and the calculated Ru−H2Oax bond energies. It appears, also, that a decrease of the electronic density along the Ru−Oax bond and the increase of the lability can be related to an increase of the π-accepting capability of the ligand. For L = N2, the calculations have shown that the Ru(II)−N2 bond is weak. Consequently, the water exchange reaction proceeds through a different mechanism, where first the N2 ligand is substituted by one water molecule to produce the hexaaqua complex of Ru(II). The water exchange takes place on this compound before re-formation of the [Ru(H2O)5N2]2+ complex.