jp505438f_si_001.pdf (1.17 MB)
Dissociation of the Anthracene Radical Cation: A Comparative Look at iPEPICO and Collision-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Results
journal contribution
posted on 2014-10-23, 00:00 authored by Brandi West, Alicia Sit, Sabria Mohamed, Christine Joblin, Valerie Blanchet, Andras Bodi, Paul M. MayerThe dissociation of the anthracene
radical cation has been studied
using two different methods: imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence
spectrometry (iPEPCO) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization–collision
induced dissociation mass spectrometry (APCI-CID). Four reactions
were investigated: (R1) C14H10+• → C14H9+ + H, (R2) C14H9+ → C14H8+• + H, (R3) C14H10+• → C12H8+• + C2H2 and (R4) C14H10+• → C10H8+• + C4H2. An attempt was made to assign structures to
each fragment ion, and although there is still room for debate whether
for the C12H8+• fragment ion
is a cyclobuta[b]naphthalene or a biphenylene cation,
our modeling results and calculations appear to suggest the more likely
structure is cyclobuta[b]naphthalene. The results
from the iPEPICO fitting of the dissociation of ionized anthracene
are E0 = 4.28 ± 0.30 eV (R1), 2.71
± 0.20 eV (R2), and 4.20 ± 0.30 eV (average of reaction
R3) whereas the Δ‡S values
(in J K–1 mol–1) are 12 ±
15 (R1), 0 ± 15 (R2), and either 7 ± 10 (using cyclobuta[b]naphthalene ion fragment in reaction R3) or 22 ±
10 (using the biphenylene ion fragment in reaction R3). Modeling of
the APCI-CID breakdown diagrams required an estimate of the postcollision
internal energy distribution, which was arbitrarily assumed to correspond
to a Boltzmann distribution in this study. One goal of this work was
to determine if this assumption yields satisfactory energetics in
agreement with the more constrained and theoretically vetted iPEPICO
results. In the end, it did, with the APCI-CID results being similar.