posted on 2020-03-31, 08:13authored byAlex Segrè
Cohen, Nancy G. Love, Kimmerly K. Nace, Joseph Árvai
Nitrogen
and phosphorus are essential ingredients in fertilizers
used to produce food. Novel methods are emerging for more efficiently
sourcing these nutrients, one of which is to recover them from recycled
human urine; once recovered, N and P can be redirected to fertilizer
production. While the technology for creating human urine-derived
fertilizer (HUDF) exists, implementing it at scale will depend on
public acceptance. Thus, this study examined U.S. consumers’
acceptance of HUDF across a range of applications and, in comparison,
to other fertilizer types. Data were collected from a representative
national sample, and analyses of variance with post-hoc comparisons were conducted to compare across fertilizer applications
and types. A hierarchical regression was conducted to assess if demographics,
psychological variables, and value orientations predict HUDF acceptance.
Results suggest that HUDF and biosolid-based fertilizers are equally
preferred and more strongly preferred than synthetic fertilizers.
HUDF is not preferred as strongly as organic fertilizers. HUDF was
deemed most acceptable when used on nonedible plants and least acceptable
when used on crops for human consumption. Regression analysis revealed
that judgments about risks and benefits were the strongest predictors
of acceptance of UDF use. These results are promising for sanitation
practitioners and regulators among others.